Teza de masterat - Responsibility to Protect and regime change - an analysis of the intervention in Libya - ID:01749 - Volum 129 pagini
Categoria : rei / Relatii internationale
Pentru a procura integral lucrarea contactați-ne! (+373) 68 484 557
I Preface 1
II Structure and Scope of the Thesis 3
Part A: Responsibility to Protect
A. Structure 5
1. Genealogy and Theoretical Background of R2P
1.1. Just War Doctrine 7
1.2. Humanitarian Intervention and R2P 9
1.3. Humanitarian Intervention 10
2. The ICISS Report on R2P
2.1. Core Principles and Foundations of R2P 17
2.1.1. Scope and Title of the Doctrine 19
2.2. Genealogy of R2P 20
2.3. Institutionalisation of R2P 22
3. Legal Questions
3.1. Human Rights 25
3.2. Prohibition of Armed Force in International Law 28
3.3. Principles of Non-interference and Sovereignty 34
3.3.1. Non-interference 35
3.3.2. Sovereignty 36
3.4. Conclusion 42
4. Responsibility to React According to the ICISS
4.1. Responsibility to React 45
4.2. Right Authority 49
5. R2P and International Relations Theory
5.1. Realism 53
5.2. Liberalism 55
5.3. Cosmopolitanism 57
5.4. English School 58
5.5. Conclusion 61
Part B: Regime Change and Libya Intervention
A. Introduction 65
B. Structure 67
1. Libya Intervention 2011-an Example for Correct Implementation of R2P?
1.1. Chronology of the Libya Intervention 69
1.2. Threshold and Precautionary Criteria of the ICISS 71
1.3. UNSC Resolution on Libya 78
1.3.1. UNSC Resolution 1970 of 26 of February 2011 78
1.3.2. UNSC Resolution 1973 of 17 of March 2011 78
1.3.3. UNSC Resolution 2009 of 16 September 2011 82
1.4. Conclusion 83
2. Regime Change
2.1. Introduction 85
2.2. Regime Change – Definition and a Judicial Analysis 85
2.2.1. Self-determination 87
2.3. Locating Regime Change in R2P 89
2.4. Forceful Regime Change Mandated by the UNSC Authorisation? 90
2.5. Conclusion 92
3. Actors Analysis of the Libya Intervention
3.1. Introduction 95
3.2. Regime Change a conditio sine quo non of R2P in Libya? 95
3.3. Conclusion 99
III Conclusion 101
Part C: Bibliography 105
II Structure and Scope of the Thesis 3
Part A: Responsibility to Protect
A. Structure 5
1. Genealogy and Theoretical Background of R2P
1.1. Just War Doctrine 7
1.2. Humanitarian Intervention and R2P 9
1.3. Humanitarian Intervention 10
2. The ICISS Report on R2P
2.1. Core Principles and Foundations of R2P 17
2.1.1. Scope and Title of the Doctrine 19
2.2. Genealogy of R2P 20
2.3. Institutionalisation of R2P 22
3. Legal Questions
3.1. Human Rights 25
3.2. Prohibition of Armed Force in International Law 28
3.3. Principles of Non-interference and Sovereignty 34
3.3.1. Non-interference 35
3.3.2. Sovereignty 36
3.4. Conclusion 42
4. Responsibility to React According to the ICISS
4.1. Responsibility to React 45
4.2. Right Authority 49
5. R2P and International Relations Theory
5.1. Realism 53
5.2. Liberalism 55
5.3. Cosmopolitanism 57
5.4. English School 58
5.5. Conclusion 61
Part B: Regime Change and Libya Intervention
A. Introduction 65
B. Structure 67
1. Libya Intervention 2011-an Example for Correct Implementation of R2P?
1.1. Chronology of the Libya Intervention 69
1.2. Threshold and Precautionary Criteria of the ICISS 71
1.3. UNSC Resolution on Libya 78
1.3.1. UNSC Resolution 1970 of 26 of February 2011 78
1.3.2. UNSC Resolution 1973 of 17 of March 2011 78
1.3.3. UNSC Resolution 2009 of 16 September 2011 82
1.4. Conclusion 83
2. Regime Change
2.1. Introduction 85
2.2. Regime Change – Definition and a Judicial Analysis 85
2.2.1. Self-determination 87
2.3. Locating Regime Change in R2P 89
2.4. Forceful Regime Change Mandated by the UNSC Authorisation? 90
2.5. Conclusion 92
3. Actors Analysis of the Libya Intervention
3.1. Introduction 95
3.2. Regime Change a conditio sine quo non of R2P in Libya? 95
3.3. Conclusion 99
III Conclusion 101
Part C: Bibliography 105


